A Evidence based guidelines - the evidence base for mammography in cyclical mastalgia
Cyclical Mastalgia
| A |
Clinical Problem |
Cyclical Mastalgia |
|
| A1 |
Ref No. in MBUR4 (if any) |
J10 |
|
| A2 |
Section in MBUR4 |
Breast disease |
|
| B |
Search strategy: databases used; period; MeSH headings; other key words. |
Medline 1966-June 2001,EMBASE 1988-2001, breast disease, mammography, Cyclical mastalgia, breast pain |
|
| C |
Search results: no. found; no. used. |
410 found, 2 used |
|
| D |
Reference numbers of cited references in attached master list. |
J10 1,2 |
|
| E |
Summarised results from each of the cited references |
Duijm et al (J10,1) performed the only study to date examining the role of imaging in women with painful breast(s). 987 women referred with breast pain alone were compared with 987 age matched controls, asymptomatic women referred for screening mammography. Prevalence of breast cancer was the same in the two groups. 12.2% of the women with breast pain had benign or probably benign findings on imaging. These authors conclude that imaging for cyclical mastalgia alone is of value only in providing reassurance. Wilson and Blamey (J10,2) responded to this study in support of this view and in their opinion state that imaging should not be performed in women in the absence of clinical signs but that those with severe symptoms should be seen in a specialist breast clinic. |
|
| F |
Statement (= the conclusion drawn from E) |
Mammography should not be performed in women with breast pain in the absence of clinical signs |
|
| G |
Evidence level of F classified I - IV |
2 |
|
| H |
Investigation |
Mammography |
|
| I |
Recommendation * |
4 Not indicated |
|
| J |
Grade of Recommendation A - C |
B |
|
| K |
Comment (if any) to go in booklet version of MBUR5 |
||
| L |
Any other comments on this problem (e.g. caveats; suggestions for research or systematic review; cost or opportunity cost; users' views. |
Erika Denton |
Comments:
References: -
| Ref ID | Author; Year; Country; Grade (I-IV). | Aims | Patient population | Study design* | Results |
| J10 1 | Duijm L E M 1998 Netherlands 2 | Determine value of imaging in women with localised or diffuse breast pain but normal clinical examination | 987 women with breast pain alone and 987 asymptomatic women undergoing screening mammography | Observational follow up | No difference in numbers of cancers found in the 2 groups. 12.2 % of those with pain had benign or probably benign findings on imaging |
| J10 2 | Wilson R, Blamey R | Women with severe problems must be seen in specialist breast clinics. (Letter) | BMJ 1999 vol 318 page 1009 |
* e.g. RCT Comparison (pro/retro-spective)
Series (pro/retro-spective)
Audit